Also Known As: - | |
Year of first release: 2015 | |
Director: Adam McKay | |
Actors: Christian Bale, Steve Carell, Ryan Gosling, Brad Pitt | |
Country: USA | |
Genre: Drama, Documentary | |
Conditions of visioning: 18.04.2016, in-flight entertainment 10" screen | |
Synopsis: Three separate but parallel stories of the U.S mortgage housing crisis of 2005 are told. Michael Burry (Bale), an eccentric ex-physician turned one-eyed Scion Capital hedge fund manager, has traded traditional office attire for shorts, bare feet and a Supercuts haircut. He believes that the US housing market is built on a bubble that will burst within the next few years. Autonomy within the company allows Burry to do largely as he pleases, so Burry proceeds to bet against the housing market with the banks, who are more than happy to accept his proposal for something that has never happened in American history. The banks believe that Burry is a crackpot and therefore are confident in that they will win the deal. Jared Vennett (Gosling) with Deutsche Bank gets wind of what Burry is doing and, as an investor believes he too can cash in on Burry's beliefs. An errant telephone call to FrontPoint Partners gets this information into the hands of Mark Baum (Carell), an idealist who is fed up with the corruption in the real estate and banking world. | |
Review: The story is told on a relatively plain manner for this controversial and hot topic. There is no scene with extra explicit drama. But the drama is there in the daily life, in the common discussion of these economists. This gives the impression that no economist cares about the consequent drama generated by the bets on North American real estate market and economy. This gives also the impression that even knowning the lie of this bet, the economists believed they would never loose, but that the state would possibly loose. The cold blood, the carelessness of the decisions taken by North American and European economists in the 2000's and presented in the movie are impressive and confirms the since then ever-decreasing lack of confidence of the people to the banks. Strangely enough the bank-led economy is almost not discussed by the campaign for president. The acting of all parties, is very convincing, because Bale manages to transmit this carelessness, because Carell manages to transmist this reluctance to what he is doing, because Gosling manages to transmit this egocentered thinking, because the two side characters who want to bring this scandal to the press manage to transmit the ambivalent will between egoism and altruism. They all manage to show how they trick their counterpart and also that finally they are not even happy with it. The technical part, camera, sound, is also quite plain and fits to this goal of showing this brutality as daily life. To me, an excellent movie for its story, its message and its acting. |
|
Rating: 8 /10
|
Monday, June 6, 2016
The big short (2015)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I saw the movie on the plane at the same time as you. I didn't like it as much as you did but after reading your review, indeed I agree that the actors are good and convey their respective messages. What I found strong in this movie is the true story behind it, but not so much the plain way of telling it and putting it into images.
ReplyDeleteEspecially I found the ending confusing. You mention that the characters are not happy about their earnings, but in fact I didn't find very clear the explanation of who ended up earning what, because none of them is happy about it. This ending seems to me too nice and shown like that just because the studio didn't want to end up showing anybody profiting happily from the financial crisis although it is what those people do through the whole movie.
My rating: 6/10.